AMP Insight gives asset managers the failure probability scoring, consequence analysis, and capital prioritization framework to move from reactive maintenance to defensible, proactive infrastructure investment.
When condition data, capital programs, and GIS data don't connect, capital prioritization defaults to whoever makes the strongest case in the budget meeting.
Condition data lives in the CMMS. Capital projects live in project management tools. The connection between asset risk and capital investment is made manually, if at all.
Without failure probability scoring and consequence-of-failure analysis, capital priority lists reflect whoever makes the strongest case in the budget meeting.
"We've always done it this way" doesn't survive rate increase scrutiny. Boards want actuarially defensible asset risk rankings.
Spatial context matters for asset risk — soil conditions, pressure zones, age clusters. But GIS and CMMS data rarely feed the same analysis.
From Weibull failure curves to GIS-integrated risk maps, AMP Insight connects the data your capital program needs to justify every investment decision.
Actuarially grounded failure probability by material, age, and installation decade. The same statistical model used by infrastructure engineers and insurance actuaries.
Failure probability combined with consequence scoring — service impact, public health risk, regulatory exposure, and repair cost — to produce a defensible priority list.
Move from a priority list based on age or staff judgment to one backed by risk-adjusted replacement need. Defensible to boards, auditors, and rate-setting bodies.
ArcGIS integration connects spatial asset data to risk scoring. See which pressure zones, soil conditions, or service areas carry the highest concentrated risk.
Projects that close out in AMP Essentials feed CMMS-ready asset records into AMP Insight. The capital record and the asset record stay connected through the lifecycle.
Generate risk maps, priority lists, and capital investment justifications directly from the platform — without manual assembly from multiple data sources.
Before AMP Insight, your capital priority list was an educated guess — age rankings, staff opinion, and whoever pushed hardest in the budget meeting. After AMP Insight, the priority list is a risk-ranked output from actuarial failure scoring, consequence-of-failure weighting, and GIS-spatial analysis.
Asset data flows in — condition records from CMMS, installation data by material and decade, spatial data from ArcGIS
Weibull curves run — failure probability scored by asset, not by age bracket or staff judgment
Consequence weighting applied — service impact, public health risk, repair cost, and regulatory exposure combined into a defensible priority score
Board-ready output — risk maps, ranked priority lists, and capital investment justifications generated from live data
The PMIS Readiness Score evaluates how well your condition data, capital program, and GIS infrastructure are positioned to support data-driven risk prioritization — and shows where to close the gaps.
Get Your PMIS Readiness Score →Takes 5 minutes. No account required.