Public infrastructure owners are accountable for billions in capital assets. Their systems were built for contractors, maintenance tasks, accounting transactions, or disconnected project administration. AMP creates the governance layer the owner's side of the contract has never had.
A platform that governs capital programs, asset risk, project delivery, compliance, and executive reporting from the owner's perspective — not the contractor's, the maintenance team's, or the IT department's.
Existing platforms were built around contractor workflows, maintenance management, IT asset systems, or generic project coordination. None were built around the public infrastructure owner's full decision lifecycle: capital planning, project delivery, asset risk, compliance, regulatory defense, board reporting, and long-term stewardship accountability.
AMP operates at the intersection of construction management software, infrastructure asset management, and a historic federal funding cycle — targeting a sub-category that existing platforms don't own.
2026 → 2031 market size
Mordor Intelligence
2025 → 2032 market size
Industry analysis
Investment gap over the next decade
ASCE estimate
AMP is built as a layered system: a practitioner PMIS at the base, an enterprise intelligence platform in the middle, and consulting services that configure and deploy the platform for each owner's context.
Owner-side PMIS built for capital delivery practitioners. RFIs, submittals, change orders, risk, compliance, and CMMS handoff — structured for the owner's governance record, not the contractor's project file. Pre-built delivery method templates cover GC/CM, PDB, DBB, and OTS.
Enterprise intelligence across capital, operations, and assets. Capital planning, asset risk scoring, operations management, executive reporting, AI advisors, and board-ready output. The layer that transforms program data into defensible owner-side intelligence.
Implementation, workflow design, delivery template configuration, data governance, and modernization roadmap. Consulting is not a services afterthought — it is how AMP's IP gets operationalized inside each owner's specific program context and organizational structure.
AMP's competitive position is not built on feature lists. It is built on practitioner IP, delivery method expertise, platform alignment, and benchmark data that accumulates with every deployment.
Methods across owner-side infrastructure governance, risk scoring, compliance automation, Weibull PM-compliance scoring, agentic CIP formation, and autonomous work order generation.
Designed by utility management and capital delivery practitioners — not software engineers building for a generic market. Domain data models encode 20+ years of owner-side program delivery.
Purpose-built templates and workflow logic for GC/CM, progressive design-build, DBB, and OTS — covering pre-construction governance, GMP management, owner contingency, and CMMS-ready closeout.
Native M365, Entra ID, SharePoint, Power BI, and Azure integration. Positioned inside the public agency technology stack, not alongside it.
PMIS Readiness assessments generate proprietary industry benchmark data across capital program maturity. Data asset grows with every assessment — creating a compounding informational advantage.
Deployed in production for complex alternative delivery capital programs including GC/CM and progressive design-build. Not a demo environment — a live operational record.
Each stage compounds on the last. Entry through a single capital program creates data and relationships that expand into enterprise intelligence.
AMP Essentials PMIS in one capital delivery program. Establish the governance foundation and data architecture.
Reports Hub and portfolio intelligence across the full program office. Cross-project visibility and executive reporting.
AMP Insight enterprise intelligence across capital, operations, and assets. Risk scoring, compliance, and AI advisors at full agency scope.
AI advisors, digital twin sync, federated governance across multi-program agencies. The full owner-side operating system.
Software subscriptions provide recurring base revenue. Implementation and platform engagements expand contract value. Partner channels extend geographic and vertical reach without proportional headcount growth.
Essentials and Insight SaaS subscriptions — annual recurring revenue against a defined seat and module structure.
Workflow configuration, data governance, delivery template implementation, and program modernization roadmap engagements.
Enterprise expansion engagements, custom integrations, and module development for large multi-program public agencies.
Referral, co-sell, and implementation partner channel through engineering firms, CM firms, and public sector integrators.
These are not trends that might materialize. They are conditions that are active now — creating urgency for owner-side governance infrastructure that the market has not previously had a platform to address.
IIJA, BIL, SRF, and ARPA are injecting hundreds of billions into public infrastructure — creating program governance complexity that generic tools cannot handle. Federal funding comes with compliance documentation requirements that start at project inception, not closeout.
GC/CM and progressive design-build adoption is accelerating in water, wastewater, and public works — requiring owner-side governance tools that don't exist in the market. Alternative delivery creates owner governance obligations that traditional project management tools weren't designed for.
Over 40% of US water infrastructure is past design life. Asset management planning requirements are intensifying at every level of government. Without structured risk-scoring and capital planning, utilities are scheduling replacements by intuition rather than evidence.
Senior utility staff are retiring at unprecedented rates. Owner-side PMIS preserves institutional knowledge and governance continuity. When program knowledge lives in people rather than systems, staff transitions create governance gaps that boards and auditors notice.
Boards, councils, and state regulators are demanding documented, defensible capital program governance that spreadsheets and email cannot provide. Rate increase requests require capital program justification. Regulatory enforcement is increasing. The bar for documentation is rising continuously.
AMP's team is available for briefings under NDA. Architecture documentation, implementation case studies, and product roadmap are available for qualified conversations.